Back in 1995 a company fails and ensures a shortfall of about a billion and a half, at that time were not peanuts.
's Attorney, with an incredible speed, after only one year, obtained from the GUP decree ordering the trial in confornti of the two directors.
The Court, after waiting five years in a trial full of twists, finally in 2001 discovered that the fact " was configured differently than in the charges " and orders the transmission of documents to the PM. These
obtained in February 2004, a new trial with a new larger formulation of imputation, but the Court declared invalid even this formulation and transmits the documents to the PM, which, however, strengthened by the fact that the GUP was the same who had ordered the proceedings and therefore believed that the correct charge, does not change anything and get in December 2004, another decree ordering the trial, but the Court, of course, also cancel this decree.
The PM at this point still change the charge and get the fourth decree ordering the trial in May 2006.
This time the Court makes no questions about the charge, but discovers that, with the entry into force of the former Cirielli (December 2005), which reduced the terms of prescription, the crime of bankruptcy was terminated in 2007 after 12 years and six months from bankruptcy and, therefore, with a few lines of reasoning, declaring the offense settled for two directors.
Some might think that evil, if it had not been found to settle the offense this case, there would be the fifth round between GUP and the Court.
The creditors of the bankrupt company and the employees were not at all fun to watch the match.
0 comments:
Post a Comment