This is a case of illegal occupation of a property. The offense is expected from 'Art. 633 CP and is a crime peacefully.
counsel for the defendant asks to be admitted to the oblation (which is a way of extinguishing the sun fines) and the ruling here (in the content of which is not given notice of opinion, positive or negative PM):
"By order of the GIP .... the defendant admitted causing the oblation in the Euro .... sum to be paid in addition to paying the costs.
The defendant has regularly paid the amount due within the term imposed.
Go, therefore, pronounced sentence not to proceed, ex art. 129 Code of Criminal Procedure for the offense settled in mind the provisions of art. 162 a uc (meaning the CPP, which deals only contraventions ed).
For the reader not a lawyer, remember that the distinction between crimes and misdemeanors is one of the first things you study the course of criminal law, as well as basic principle is that the sacrifice is a means to define only the fines.
The ruling is the work of robed judges and always highly evaluated in career advancement.
0 comments:
Post a Comment